in

SUPREME COURT GRANTS EXPEDITED HEARING OF TRUMP’S EXECUTIVE ORDER

The Supreme Court granted an expedited hearing on Executive Order 13780, the revised Trump executive order that restricted travel to the United States from 6 countries. Various judges across the United States have been acting extra-judicially, using the President’s campaign statements and not the actual order, to form their opinions.

The Supreme Court told the American Civil Liberties Union to file their response by 3:00 PM on Monday, June 12 and to respond to the Department of Justice’s request for a stay on the existing stay of the executive order.

Immigration activists sued, along with several immigrants and their families. A liberal federal district judge in Maryland granted a preliminary injunction blocking Section 2(c) of the EO. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit then affirmed the trial court’s injunction in a 10-3 decision, ruling that the EO violated the Constitution’s Establishment Clause, and taking the almost unheard-of step of all the court’s judges hearing the case, instead of sending it to a three-judge panel.

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a petition for review at the Supreme Court on Thursday. Under the Court’s rules, a response from the plaintiffs would be due July 3. By that time the Court would be on recess for the summer, meaning that the justices would vote at the Court’s annual pre-Term conference, which will take place on September 25, on whether to take the case. That would typically mean hearing arguments in December or January, with a final decision coming down in early or mid-2018.

Acting Solicitor General Jeff Wall at DOJ also asked Chief Justice John Roberts (who supervises the Fourth Circuit) to stay the appellate court’s decision until the justices can decide the matter.

The Court could conceivably then vote immediately on whether to take the case, or anytime shortly thereafter. Under a normal briefing schedule, the Court would then hear arguments in October, and issue a decision by the end of 2017.

It’s also possible that the Court could accelerate briefing on an emergency basis, then hold arguments over the summer, or possibly even in June before recessing for the summer. The Court could make clear by the week of June 12 which course it is pursuing.

 
NWC

Written by NWC

World class hater of the United States Political Establishment and their globalism fetishes, especially unfettered immigration.

Leave a Reply

Loading…

Sparta Report Podcast

Sparta Report Podcast 6-1-17 Part II

BREAKING – Terror Attack in Three London Locations: People Mowed Down, Stabbings, Shots Fired