TWO COUNTRIES AND INTERNAL SECESSION: The Old Traditionalists live here, the New Vulgarians, over there

hillary clinton alive
Hey, at least she won that popular vote, right?

OK Sparti­cles, you regulars know I much admire the musings and screeds of expat blogger extra­or­di­naire Fred Reed.

Fred is no neo-con, no Bushophile and no fan of The Deep State.

He is proba­bly a paleo­con and at best a Trump Agnos­tic.

But damn, when he hits a home run he crush­es it.

So roll the dice and read this one, ok?

The snark (the Trump snark, anyway) is minimal an I encour­age ya’ll to just plow forward, because if I could write this well Fossten and the Other Big Dogs would have to ladle some extra gruel into my rusted tin cup every day.

Select­ed quotes, but no excuse for not gobbling up the whole post, Spartans:

Trump did not cause the deep division in the country. It caused him. There are two very differ­ent Ameri­c­as. I suspect  that the half of the country that voted for Trump, that voted with wild enthu­si­asm, that roared at huge rallies, was not so  much voting for Trump as again­st the other Ameri­ca. It was just that they had never had a chance before. The two countries have little in common and do not belong on the same geogra­phy.

The differ­ence begins with manners. Through­out the campaign Trump’s parti­sans forgath­ered in huge rallies, applaud­ed, calmly went home, and later voted.  At the same time we saw on Clinton’s behalf mobs of ill-bred, worse mannered, loutish, peren­ni­al adoles­cents block­ing  highways, shutting down rallies, engag­ing in vandal­ism and physi­cal­ly attack­ing support­ers of Trump. Cars were destroyed, fires set, ATMs smashed. Black Lives Matter, always ghetto preda­tors, were worst, but low-grade college students and their equal­ly dismal profes­sors joined in. They were obscene, infan­tile.

 

Can you imagine any of Trump’s middle-American support­ers accus­ing Obama of lusting for incest with his daugh­ters?  The two camps are differ­ent peoples. Half of the country seems cultur­al­ly dominat­ed from the ghetto. The other half embod­ies standards of behav­ior that have usual­ly been thought congru­ent with civil society.

 

The divide is far deeper and more gener­al than the heat of the election. The sprawl­ing class from which the protest­ers come, not just in Washing­ton or just recent­ly, oppos­es the bedrock of our approx­i­ma­tion of democ­ra­cy. It is not an econom­ic divide. On Ameri­can campus­es almost every­where “students,” most of whom do not have the intel­li­gence for college, use the tactics of Brown Shirts to shut down speech­es by anyone who does not agree with them.  They have no concep­tion of reasoned debate, toler­a­tion of disagree­ment, or respect for law. Rather than promote  assim­i­la­tion to the Ameri­can norm, or what was the Ameri­can norm, the only hope to keep the country from devolv­ing into warring tribes, they promote identi­ty politics. They do not, for example, disavow the depre­da­tions of Black Lives Matter. Any behav­ior is accept­able, even admirable, if engaged in by their side.

 

And so from a mainstream performer, Beyon­ce, the lyrics

“Can you lick my Skittles, it’s the sweet­est in the middle/ Pink is the flavor, solve the riddle”

Painful­ly cute. Can you imagine Billie Holiday singing this? Ella Fitzger­ald? From rappers there is far more explic­it, scato­log­i­cal, and sadomasochis­tic “music.” Whether you think this is people’s art, the authen­tic expres­sion of an oppressed race, or something that should be scrawled on the wall of a public toilet, tracks with who you voted for. Again, two countries.

 

These vandals are the storm troop­ers of the Clinton Ameri­ca. I cannot imagine the Other Ameri­ca behav­ing thusly because of the sched­ul­ing of any speak­er whatev­er.

For whatev­er reason, those who regard themselves as liber­als are far more given to demon­strat­ing and rioting than conser­v­a­tives, and far more vulgar. I say “regard themselves as liber­als.” Their behav­ior is opposite to classi­cal liber­al­ism. Vulgar­i­ty is not liber­al­ism. Neither is arson. Neither is suppres­sion of free speech. All of these are now the norm on campus­es, in the media, among both students and profes­sors. And among the protest­ers.

Anoth­er country.

 

Click here for the whole article.

Comment Rules

1) If it would get you thrown out of a bar, it will get you thrown out of here


2) Try to keep off topic discussion to the open thread or the forums


3) Ejections will be sending the offender to "commune with the fishes" - notice will not usually be given in advance or acknowledged after execution


4) Confirmation will only be made in cases where an EXAMPLE must be made to "encourage the others"


Loading...